Plan actions in Teams versus Planner for webįollowing is a breakdown of the functionality available when viewing on a Teams tab, the Tasks app in Teams, and viewing through Planner for web. To find out more, see Use the Tasks app in Teams. Shared plans are all of the plans you've added to teams channels. Assigned to me is powered by To Do and shows tasks you've added through that app, through Outlook tasks or flagged emails, or Planner tasks that are assigned to you. In the app: In the Tasks app, initially called the Planner app, you can see both Assigned to me and Shared plans. Following is a list of plan actions in Teams versus Planner for web. You can also go to the website by opening your plan in Planner for web. You can do almost everything in here that you can do in Planner for the web. In the team channel: When you add a plan on a channel tab, you can see your plan in context of the rest of your team conversations, files, and more. Once you've added your plan in Teams, there are two ways you can get started using it: Third party copyright material has been removed from ethesis.Note: You can also add the same plan to multiple tabs. Improving Tool Support for Personal Task Management (PTM)Īn open access version is available from UCL Discovery The contributions of this thesis are a development of the PTM framework, describing the key factors that influence academics in managing their tasks a development of personas, explaining characteristics of different groups of academics and PTM strategies that they employ over time and an evaluation of existing PTM tools, determining their strengths and limitations and providing recommendations. Finally, an in-depth expert analytical evaluation of a set of existing tools using CASSM identifies the conceptual misfits between users and the existing tools. The data gathered in the user studies was analysed using a grounded theory (GT) approach, and the findings were then used to build personas of academics. challenges, context awareness, etc.), broadening the understanding of the complexity of PTM behaviours. The findings extend the PTM framework to include other aspects of users (e.g. Thirdly, a video-diary study examines the inconsistencies discovered between the interview and member-checking studies.
Secondly, a member-checking study tests the accuracy of the framework. the underlying activities and contextual factors).
Firstly, a semi-structured interview study develops a PTM framework, describing the components of PTM (i.e. This includes both empirical and analytical approaches, conducted through four different studies. The research adopts a user-centred design methodology. The aims of this thesis were therefore to understand how academics manage their tasks, to identify the conceptual gaps between them and the existing electronic tools, and to establish requirements for guiding the design and evaluation of PTM tools. There appears to be little attempt to develop a framework for describing people’s task management behaviour, making it difficult to determine the extent to which these tools meet users’ needs. There are hundreds of commercial electronic PTM tools available on the market which users can choose from. Personal Task Management (PTM) describes the planning, prioritising and list-making of tasks employed by an individual user. Improving Tool Support for Personal Task Management (PTM).ĭoctoral thesis, UCL (University College London).ĪKamsinPhD_Revised_Thesis_Minor_Corrections_without_comments.pdf._REDACTION.pdf
0 kommentar(er)
